Bradley Lexvold
Bradley Lexvold

Where to Find Us:



New Orleans, LA

What's New

Special Facebook Promotion!
Like us on Facebook and get 10% off your next order.

Welcome to our website.

We must move beyond symblism as it has become what it was percieved to be in the past, just

 

gestures. We have seen what it has been portrayed as being in the cinama, someone walks past a church

 

and they act meek and humble but go and become corrupt as soon as they round the corner. Governing

 

bodies that overseen this misinterpretation were shunned and lost influence. Reality is that God sees our

 

every move, even knows our every thought, that  is why Jesus said wherever there are two or more

 

gathered in my name, there I will be also. Just as Jesus said to pray by ourselves, we also don't  need to

 

have fellowship to seek  God. To move beyond symblism we must put ourselves on a one to one

 

relationship with God. The Isrealites used Moses to interseed on thier behalf, but we need to be closer to

 

God than they were. He already knows everything about you, so there is nothing that you can bring up that

 

is not already known. The requirements for citezenship are just not to have committed a capital crime and

 

be willing to be an instrument of God's will. If you require a punishment for a crime you have committed

 

in the past wouldn't it be best to have it carried out by people who would see to it that the appropriate steps

 

were taken to regain your eternal salvation. Repentance demands that you stand up and admit your wrong-

 

doing so as to regain your standing in your community, it is a regaining of selfrespect and uplifting of

 

position, not an undignified embarrasment. No symbolic gesture can convince your heart to reform and

 

the symbolic gesture of going to church every Sunday won't  ward off the temtations of the flesh. People

 

and governments have tried to develop certain daily tasks and rituals to retain quality aspects of character

 

but all have unfortunatly failed to bring about the required goal. To bring about the nessasary

 

requirements to see the world populatiuon through the millenium we should  establish a set of realistic

 

guidelines to retain proper character.  Instead of allowing ourselves to do bad and then to balance our ying

 

and yang do some good, we should just do good all of the time, after all there is no lasting pleasure in

 

doing wrong only to have our conscience bother us about it later. There is just to much time lost fretting

 

about things that were done, when that time could have been spent in an enjoyable atmosphere. We must

 

be careful not to carismatically enslave others as is done in the Hindu's by telling the lower classes they

 

just don't have the ability to atain a higher level until they die and are reborn into another class.  In the

 

book  THE UNKNOWN LIFE OF JESUS CHRIST it is documented that Christ told the Hindu's what they

 

were doing was wrong and they would be held accountable for it. Ritual chanting never drives the point

 

home. It is similar to the self induced brainwashing techniches of Alchoholics Anomamos. To live to a

 

slave of recovery is still being a slave to something.The truth is the truth and it is always eventually

 

revealed. Fellowship and aspirations are never enough, one must have a reasonable plan of action. Even if

 

our plans go aray we would be negligent if we didn't make an effort. But we must be realistic in our goals

 

and uncompramising in our Godgiven principles. It is for Him that we must do what must be done and for

 

his slain children. READ, LEARN, AND INWARDLY DIGEST.

 

                It was once proposed that the Nephilim that are mentioned in Genesis 6:4 were the Neandertals.

 

It was later discarded because it was thought the fossil record showed there existance to be suspect and

 

there extinction was brought about before humans were alive. Current scientific thought suggests that

  

they did live side by side. God doesn't do anything without a good reason and it is a fact that they did

 

exist, so there must have been a function for them to facilitate. When I heared of this theory it was first

 

said they existed so as to make the animals used to there existance in the animals enviroment so that when

 

humans came into the enviroment the animals were used to seeing creatures of these proportions dwelling

 

in there midst. I took this to mean that it was for the animals benifit. This made me very suspect because

 

animals simply don't need this and animals don't teach traits like that to there offspring,at least to my

 

knowledge. But I used to think that the earth was created in 6-24hr. days and athough I was suspect, I

 

felt it would be a betrayal to my teachers to think otherwise. I realized I was wrong when a group of islands

 

in Iceland were formed and birds flew there to investigate and releave themselves and in so doing planted

 

and starter fertilized plants which sprang up shortly thereafter even while some linguring vulcanic action

 

was still taking place. The expansion of creation as spelled out in the sequence of the Bible. Why did God

 

create birds before other animals? So as to spread out plant life. Where I come from a rock cut in a road

 

always showed a flat grade of bedrock so it was an easy sell to tell us it was a mass that had rivers cut

 

through it by running water. But when I seen bedrock with its grain not running flat and level with the

 

earth this made me highly suspect of my beliefs. I now see this former thinking as nievety and blind

 

loalty to past teachers. Another holdout reason was there use of phrases like age of rocks, but I didn't

 

realize what they meant,so the only way to ascertain the truth is to investigate. I found a Christian book

 

store and found two different books on creation. One lumped all 15 billion years of creation into the first

 

day followed by 6-24hr. days. This was a compramise between God and science and I thought it to be the

 

nonscenceible ramblings of an idiot. The other book I got was from Hugh Ross and it was well thought out

 

and well referanced. Most importantly it made a complete integration of  Scripture and science. For me to

 

not take it as fact seemed irresponcible, as if I wanted to find fault I would have to sepparately disprove

 

all his referances, and that would take more than a life time for one person, so I accepted it with blind but

 

hopefully better informed faith. With all of these people saying these Neandtertal's existed and looking at

 

Gen. 6:4 objectively it is apparent that the early interpretation of the Nephilim are indeed the Neandertal.

 

One must consider all aspects and part of that is the way words are said, the sequence they are in, and all

 

possible meanings. Some distinctions are obvious, the sons of God are human beings with an eternal soul.

 

The daughters of men are the female Neandertal's. One must remember that the language that was used

 

had less words in it then, so calling them daughters of men isn't a streach when it is explained that human

 

males were called sons of God. Some speculated that these sons of God were superhumans with divine

 

capabilities but there is nothing to substanciate this explanation. It is also a hold over of the wrongfull

 

total depravity theory. The people who dreamed up the total depravity may have been totally depraved,

 

but there limitations and inabilities are not mine. When we are born we receive a soul from heaven and

 

thus we are sons of God, at least until we commit crimes that damn us to hell.   When God said we will

 

make man in our own image he meant a being possesing a soul. The word in the Hebrew for image has a

 

meaning of phantom. With a limited vocabulary this is the clear meaning.  In the expanded version of

 

The Interpreters Dictionary of The Bible it says " The exact meaning of the word is uncertain; it is

 

therefore left untranslated. Although the word is rendered "giants" in the KJV, it should not be confused

 

with the more widely used  Hebrew words for giant". Jewish tradition regards these Nephilim as fallen or

 

more importantly as "inferior ones", which is exactly what Neandertal's were. Without an eternal soul they

 

were animals but with a likeness to men. In The Strong's Exhaustive Concordance the word shows up only

 

twice in the Bible. Once in Genesis 6:4 and again in Numbers13:33 and its use in Numbers is to say at the

 

very least highly suspect. One must read Numbers very carefully, as it is easily misinterpreted.  Quote

 

"And there we see the Nephilim,the sons of Anak, which come of the giants." The first time you may read

 

this you may think that when they say sons of Anak they are describing the Nephilim in some manner and

 

when it says they come from the Nephilim this would seem to substantiate this but this is not what was

 

written in Hebrew. The words "which come "are not documented in the Concordence only in this sentance

 

which is suspect . Also they were trying to present size and number so as to present an overwhelming

 

force which makes the sons of Anak an addition to the Nephilin, not an explanation of who they were.

 

Which come of the giants being a suspect phrase and there true nature of there enemies heredity not

 

known makes this statement almost meaningless. God doesn't decieve in his book and in the verces

 

prior it clearly states with absolute clarity that this is a false and inacurate statement made by people

 

trying to be purposefully decieteful. They could have completely made up the statement of the Nephilim

 

to bring up past hidden fear because of how they were involved in man's fall before the flood. So one

 

can completely ignore this second referance of them and concentrait on the first and only exact referance.

 

Hints were made in Jewish traditions that the Nephilim existed before man and this is substanciated by

 

current science. Let's look at this from God's eyes. These eternal soul bearing males took them wives of

 

all that they chose. One can conclude here that it wasn't a problem obtaining them and to say they married

 

them meant they had sexual relations with them, not that they had a ceremony. No ceremonies were ever

 

done back then, esspecially not for having sex with your nieghboring animals. Not having to put up with

 

constant attitude nor high maintanance this would have seen an alternative. Corruption takes time to take

 

hold over a person so in the next sentance God shortens the days men live on the earth.  Then is the

 

explanation of who is being talked about in description as the Nephilim. They existed and also afterward

 

so they didn't die out. If they took wives unto them it would be understood that there would have been

 

prodigy without mentioning then specifically. Then " And they bare children unto them," this statement is

 

important. This statement is put in here as God seen it as an added insult to him for this abomination to

 

take place. How this coupling could have produced offspring is not of my comprehension but a horse and

 

a donkey create a sterile mule and a freak coppulation between a cat and a rabbit created a creature that

 

had a cats head and front paws and back of a rabbit. It stride gated on the front while hopping on the back.

 

Freaks these unions would be sure to be. No mention of how long these offspring lived or anything that

 

suggests that they made it to adulthood. In its context one can suppose they were not regarded holesemly.

 

Being of not a natural union one can conclude they didn't live long on this earth. After all they were

 

regarded as a byproduct of a met need, not as prodigy. These females were used as sexual gratification

 

and pet animals not wives. This was done by men of renown, or fame. This takes time and development of

 

attributes and not nessasary holesome attributes. If the fossil record shows these Neandertals as recieving

 

wounds that are later healed it is not a streach to assume that humans may have come accross them

 

injured and took them in and cared for them. This is done widely today by vetrinarians. Even animals now

 

with broken bones are splinted. Large animals are suspended with girdles even to keep there ruminant

 

stomachs opperating properly until bones are healed. This close contact could be what initially led to

 

cohabitation and later copulation. Evils easiest way to enter is through good deeds. After coppulating with

 

a few of them they just took them whenever the need arose even if it meant killing the male protectores to

 

ackomplish this. If Neandertals were lumbering dopes they could have been used as target practice and

 

live training for combat readiness and to develop other forms of combat training. If Neandertals couldn't

 

understand how to use a bow and arrows they would have been easy prey to obtain there females. This is

 

probably how these men developed fighting skills to fight other humans and become of notariety. It would

 

have been easily recognizale that these offspring weren't holy being capable of posessing an eternal soul so

 

in God's eyes these men were without excuse. Seeing the complexities of this union through God's eyes, do

 

you give these offspring a soul , a half soul, or nothing , and just the impurity of it all would have been

 

intolerable.  When males coppulate with human females a soul is sent down from heaven at the time

 

of conception. And so we see in the very next line God's plan to end it all. If this seems a strech of the

 

imagination then consider man's inhumanity to other human beings , even the surgical slaughter of 1.5

 

billion offspring flushed down the sewer with not a grave or any comprehensive or cognisant thought

 

given to a one. With these fighting skills obtained from fighting Neandertals it would have been easy to

 

fight against weeker humans and it is well documented throughout history how a carismatic leader can

 

lead many astray and bring destruction down upon his own subjects. This is the reason for limiting life

 

spans because when this leader dies a change of power always brings about a change and hopefully most

 

of the time for the better. If God created Neandertals, or if it happened by episodal evolution,the new

 

athiest's spin of political correctness, then they had a purpose. If they were to occupy a land until humans

 

needed it for habbitation then it makes sence to have animals that look like humans. It would make the

 

animals much easier to prey upon and then the nessasary supper meal was always guarantied. After all

 

this was in the hunter, gatherer stage with no food storage program thus the need for steady game for 

 

human survival. Animals that were used to being around human types would not have recognized they

 

became human prey until it was to late. When you move to another area you scout it out first. The young

 

men of the tribe would have watched Neandertals obtain food and copied. If the Neandertals were taken by

 

a bear it would have been better than a human life so scouting would have provided much better insight

 

with them in an area already than not having them there, after all man's direct assosiation from God had

 

been severed. God also wanted humans to occupy the whole earth and constantly seeking new lands from

 

which to obtain game from would have had a spreading out effect. This is how you lead rebellious people,

 

you don't directly tell them what to do , you indirectly leave them no other choice.  Animals respond

 

differently to proposed threats. Some bears in the Kamchatka Peninsula pay no mind to humans at all

 

while others scatter from a proposed threat, the ones that have witnessed humans shooting there pack. But

 

other animals more livestockish pay no attention to humans at all. A good example of this is the buffalo in

 

Yellowstone National Park. Sharpshooters are brought in to kill animals that have wandered off. If you

 

want to see stupidity in action watch these rifleman kill these animals and then are baffled as to why these

 

animals don't see an invisible fence, something a dog even needs to be taught. Another thing that one

 

must remain cognicent of is that the were regarded as fair, this meant they were fair in the eyes of the

 

beholder, the referance coming from the observer not any one else. This interpretation may or may not be

 

true but people have debated over the flood being brought about through the Bosphorous Strait or in

 

Tigris and Euphrates river valleys. The simplest explanation is the correct one, both floods happend. we

 

sometimes want to think if something Biblical happened closer to us we feel closer to God. The Auxum's

 

Razor Theory does seem to work.

 

                Insight is a valuable tool to develop. Possessing an eternal soul, God dwells within you.

 

Contemplation and dicemination of ideas within ones self gives you access to God's perpective without

 

needing any outside referances. Although to cut a straight line one uses a guide because freehand won't

 

have the desired accuracy and books and video referances can be of much value when one comes to a

 

determination from insight it lasts a lifetime.

 

                God using nature to bring about his vengance to a people he hates doesn't diminish his authority

 

or suggest he isn't taking an active role. It can be considered true that the pestilance brought about during

 

Pharoes unwillingness to let the Isrealites go could have indeed been brought about by natural causes

 

 from an islands freakish calamities some distance away and Sodomn and Gomorah being hailed upon

 

from pent up gas pockets from beneath the earth but one must be aware of how people can feel his or his

 

angels presences. If one thinks God used divine force to push back walls of water to pass through the Red

 

Sea you are in error. Pharoes men followed them, which they would not have done if they would have felt

 

the presence of divine beings at work. Proper reading of the text ,and the finding of the true Mount Siani

 

as Jawal Laws  in the book THE  GOLD OF EXUDUS  , you can see how it was done. Moses used his

 

staff as a measure of his faith in God and the Lord " all that night drove the sea back with a strong east

 

wind " . God used hurricane force winds to drive out and lower the water level in the Gulf of Aqaba

 

exposing a ridge of high land. The text says they went on dry land in the midst of the sea, not through

 

walls of water. One could use the terminoligy of having walls of water but that can mean over the side of

 

an embankment, and not nessasarily walls of water above your level. When this water wanted to return to

 

natural level it would have gushed in and was helped by another wind. A deluge of water is seen many

 

times today in its catastrauphic events and unable to return to high ground it would have been impossible

 

not to have perished. My point is this, divine intervension can be physically felt, wether it is done through

 

quantum mechanics or extra dimensionality its presence is physically felt.  To minimize his presence he

 

does this from a distance so as not to put his enemies on guard.

 

                People doubt the account of Joshua stopping the sun and moon from changing location in the sky.

 

There is also an accounting of the sun doing miraculas things for a crowd in Spain to correctly fulfil three

 

childrens accounting from an angel. This can easily be explained by the most common quantum

 

experiment. The sun and moon didn't change location in the sky because God redirected the light

 

emminating from them to help his people.

 

                Freedom:   freedom isn't the right to offend others or to promote and live perversly, rather,

 

freedom is the ability to be in charge of your own destiny. That is to change jobs at will, to seek higher

 

education, to redirect your interests and pursuits God gave you life to live it. If one practices self control

 

one will be ready to meet ones maker before you die.

 

                The parale of the talents isn,t about money, it is about what you do with the life God gave you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Print Print | Sitemap
© Bradley Lexvold